Why this blog exists...

The Magpie

Sunday, November 30th, 2025   |   160 comments

Tick Teaser: So The Premier Has Exposed His Big Swinging Nick To Townsville, But Will There Be A Similar Unzipping In Hinchinbrook ?

Early counting seem to confirm preferences will decide the outcome. Whatever that is,  it will have been Crisafulli’s doing.  A bold gamble because a loss will strengthen Brutus Bleijie’s dagger hand, but a win will hold Castle Crisafulli for the moment.

But even before there was a lick of the pencil and a shaky X put to paper, one loser had already been established … the Queensland taxpayer.  How will the government justify their blatant $100k+ vote buying with public money?

The Premier’s memory suffers a senior moment on the campaign trail, forgetting the rule of pots and kettles.

TwoNames Thompson has just learnt one of life’s core lessons: karma might dawdle along sometimes , but it eventually arrives at its destination.  The man the Astonisher front-paged as King Con is gone from our public life with a blaze of shame in the national media. But like a fart in a lift,  his presence remains, although he’s got off at the basement..

Once again, The sensation-seeking Bulletin makes a total ass of itself,  this time,  making a spectacular show of the local ignorance that would be hilarious if it wasn’t so embarrassing.

If hanging from coat tails was a sport, Townsville Enterprise would be Olympic class … during the week, they made or implies two phantasmagorical involvements.

The stunningly stupid verdict of a NSW judge, who has done her judicial best to further sour police/indigenous relations.

And an AI video that is one of the best funny/sad potted history of the mob-boss US President, as seen through the eyes of the founding fathers.  .Enjoy the sensation of being being appalled and amused at the same time.

If Black Friday hasn’t completely vacuumed your purse, the Nest could do with the helping hand of a donation to meet on-going costs. The link to help out your favourite weekly read is at the end of the blog.

HINCHINBROOK.

Don’t be fooled by an 11% lead by Cheezy, ahead of Frothy. Check out your guess how preferences will flow from this, which is how things stood when counting closed last night shortly before The Magpie’s own deadline.

Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 11.51.05 pm

Here’s the link to check out the latest.

Richo Famously Said Of Politics ‘Whatever It Takes’ –  David Crisafulli Said ‘Where’s My Chequebook?’

Of course, The Ingham Kid meant   ‘where;’s the taxpayers’ chequebook’.

There can be no doubt that the taxpayers of Queensland have footed the bill for the LNP campaign for Hinchinbrook, and any snivelling justification when questions are asked will be the shame of the Chrisafulli Government.  How Ingham became host to so many government jetsetters (17) in the last two or three weeks than have graced their portals decades isn’t hard to figure out? The Premier’s almost maniac desire to bring his home town back into the LNP fold was a plan with many components, one of which turned out to be the morally dishonest power of incumbency.  Even the Bulletin was on to the brazen scam.

Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 10.41.46 am

And for once, the paper not only asked a question, it was the right question.

Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 3.51.32 pm

This is a clear use of incumbent advantage, which is not illegal but is a cynical use of position, especially in a humble by election.   And for a seat that is ostensibly in no way crucial to our state government. I say ostensibly, because this is funding an internal LNP power struggle, with Bleijie holding the hard right majority numbers in the party room, and is waiting for an excuse for a spill. That seems unlikely any time soon,  Crisafulli is doing a pretty good job as far as the majority of the public is concerned – but it takes just one stumble that can be amplified to bring the leadership to a head – especially when there is a well planned strike waiting in the wings.

On the question of stumbles,  Crisfulli is running a fine line here.  KAP HQ have threatened legal action over this campaign ads comparing Molachino with disgraced former mayor Troy Thompson.

Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 5.52.15 pm

Tenuous to say the least, to compare the open knowledge and admission of once having been in the Labor Party (which is not a criminal act – I think) to the outright deceit and immorality of Thompson, it was really quite ridiculous. But the LNP smarties  figured when the KAP-leaning Lil Abners of the Hinchinbrook back blocks took time off from impregnating their sisters long enough, they’d buy this deeply flawed argument. But while that is as it may be,  Crisafulli had a moment of hyper hypocriticality when he said: ” It is important that anyone running an election has to be honest about record”.

Oh, right, David, like how when you moved south and ran in Broadwater, you laid out all your murky dealings this serial shyster Rabieh Krayem, the collapse of a company you’d taken over from him,  unrefuted claims of trading insolvent, and the $200k payout you say you made in the wash-up. Of course, none of this was known until well after the election and you were rising though the LNP ranks. And while it may not put much of a cloud over your basic overall honesty,  might be good to stay away from the questions of transparency in others …  very shaky ground for you, some might say.

(Sigh) Our Bipolar Paper Was At It Again During The Week

Talk about highs and lows! In The ‘Pie’s view, the Bulletin made a pretty good fist of its campaign coverage,  and they even managed to keep the crowing to the lower levels of the upper decibel band about the long awaited Fall of Troy, a story that offered them a chance for a great front page  they’d no doubt been sweating on for more than a year.

Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 10.58.13 am

They nailed this egregious shyster comprehensively, with statistics, timelines and damning quotes from the CCC investigation, many from the grub himself.  All round good work, but as the age-old saying in newsrooms have it, you’re only as good as your last story. So out of nowhere, we were treated to this bit inanity, as reported in comments on the day.

The Magpie

This is a serious question, not a cheap sneer.

Doesn’t anyone at the Bulletin, top to bottom, have the faintest idea of how utterly stupid this makes them look?

For those who’ve been here more than two seconds … make that, say five years, no, just this year, say last January … this is a mystifying head scratcher, the ultimate WTFF headline. No sleep is heavy enough to miss such an event.

But it gets even more idiotically puerile when we read the ‘evidence’ in the story …

Seriously, Bully peeps …. don’t you ever … oh, forget it, words really do fail us on this one.

 TEL Tells Us Another Whopper Or Two.

Has this bloody council not learned a thing about the disadvantages outsourcing services that rightly should remain within the council’s immediate purview? Like a mass staff purge, with vacated positions going to contractors at vastly dearer rates.

There is disquiet in the local arts community with the recent lily-livered council decision to ‘outsource’  responsibility for the creative community’s future to Townsville Enterprise. A move that shows they really are just toying with us, but it seems no amount of indignant complaint about the wasteful TEL support package will have any effect (such complaining rarely does unless parking meters are involved).

Regular Nest commenter ‘Bob’ posted this during the week.

Magpie, I can’t think of a Townsville mayor ever who wanted to ‘reform’ TEL. I thought the main purpose of TEL’s creation was to remove certain functions from TCC in order to distance the council from them, just as building inspection, road making, engineering etc. has been privatised and no longer resides as council core business. Quite recently arts/culture/tourism promotion has also been shifted out of council into TEL and another TCC office downsized – it looks like cost saving although it still costs council. Can’t think of a single reason why the new mayor would want to pull the scab off TEL. The more incompetent TEL is, the better TCC looks.

 Perhaps the outsourcing of the yarts and Kluchur is why  Clr Liam ‘Dynasty’s Child’  Mooney is now the TCC rep on the TEL board.

Meanwhile,  The Dudley Do Nothings blithely continue their conning of the public. Twice this week, they tried it on that they played a part in a couple of otherwise excellent coups for the city.  The first instance was when they carried on like a puppy wetting itself about something they tried to make suspect they had something to with – negotiating with the NRL (as fucking if!)

Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 8.54.10 pm

Now The ‘Pie welcomes this as much as anyone else, even if the opponents are the Cook Islands minnows( amazing they’ve kept their name, but maybe we speak too soon). But what is annoying is the very careful wording – especially the word ‘securing’.

From the release:  Our CEO Claudia Brumme said, “securing matches for the Rugby League World Cup 2026 is a tremendous win for Townsville and further cements our city as the Events Capital of the North. We’re proud to see global events of this scale choose Townsville and our world-class stadium as part of their destination line-up.” 

Like I said ‘securing’ is a wonderful ‘plausible denial’ word should anyone question this, but few would, and assume the suggestion is that TEL had something to do with the choice. They did not, and it’s laughable to think so.

Then there was the announcement of a Rugby Union match much further up the world pecking order. And any TEL claim was wisely watered down.

Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 7.03.59 pm

This time, the general suggestion of TEL involvement was more muted but the inference was there, although not attracting the attention of  the CEO. this time,  it was TEL’s new Director Major Events Acquisition Chelsea Cavanah who gushed that the announcement puts Townsville firmly back on the international sporting map. (Were they ever firmly on it, one asks?)

‘We’d like to thank the Crissafulli (sic) Government for securing this opportunity for Townsville. Their ongoing support highlights our region’s capability and proven track record in delivering major events that captivate Queensland and the world.”

Yes, they actually did manage to get the Premier’s name wrong … great look when you’re thanking someone.  But this raises a question or two …. why is the CEO and a middle management executive of this ostensibly private outfit announcing anything, especially things they absolutely fuck all to do with? Don’t recall the ratepayer and taxpayers electing them to speak on our behalf.  Seeking undeserved reflected glory is a dangerous route to do down, (just ask Troy TwoNames) But here’s a more serious question for Ms Cavanah. When the TCC handed over the million dollars+  of government money and responsibility for ‘event attraction’, if memory serves, the boast was that there would now be a dozen events valuable, money-spinning events within ‘the next year’.

Well, Chelsea, m’dear, the year’s almost up. care to mark your score card?

No, I didn’t think so.

Widening the Gap – A Grossly Irresponsible Judgement By A NSW Beak Is As Damaging As It Gets

Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 10.50.54 pm

One of the most misleading factors in this story is the fact that the dead boy was indigenous, a fact that had nothing whatsoever to do with his self-inflected death or the manner in which it came about. But his family and  the usual suspects in the Aboriginal Grievance Movement managed to apply plenty of pressure on this woman … although she would never admit it, and she did not make any pivotal observations about race in her loopy judgement..

Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 7.24.22 pm

NSW District Court Judge Jane Culver

And one would think think in any semblance of a sane world, this absolute dimwittery will certainly to be overturned on appeal.

Unasked and unanswered questioned abound in a judgement bound to bolster that sector of the indigenous community who insist on continuing their  campaign of ‘no responsibility victimhood’.

The ‘Pie will ask some of those questions  but first the background detailed in this balanced article in the respected National Indigenous Times.

And here is a brief overview of what happened.

Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 10.57.46 pm

In brief, in February, 2022,  this teenager, 16-year-old Jai Kalani Wright stole a trail bike and sped away from police, who, following safety protocols, did not give chase. Two other car thefts had happened in the same inner city area about the same time, so police were told to remain in the area.

Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 7.27.24 pm

Nsw Police Sgt Benedict Bryant

This man, Sergeant Benedict Bryant was told the bike was being ridden along a well-known bike path.  So in order to protect the public from a dangerously speeding motor bike thief, he parked his unmarked vehicle across exit of the bike path at an intersection. He turned off his lights, and sat waiting. Wright, travelling at speed, refused to stop and tried to take wild evasive action, but crashed and became airborne. He landed on the police car in which Bryant was sitting.. Wright died of head injuries in hospital the next day.

After a coroner’s inquest, the DPP decided to charge Sergeant Bryant with – can you believe it? – dangerous driving occasioning death. One supposes reasonably cars deemed to be parked dangerously are covered by this charge

On Friday,  after a judge only trial (this surely a matter that demanded a jury?), District Court judge Culver came to the incredible conclusion that Sgt Bryant ‘should have known placing his car without its lights and sirens activated could have caused a collision which posed a serious risk to the 16-year-old.’  Yes, folks, this judge put the safety of a fleeing lawbreaker above the  serious public risk posed by a motor bike thief speeding at up to 70kph along a public pathway.  The thief, she implied,  should’ve been allowed to to see a police car in plenty of time to avoid it, and get away.

Give us a fuckin’ break, lady.

In essence, – speaking in the real world –  Jai Wright killed himself through irresponsible and criminal misadventure,  and Sergeant Bryant did his duty in protecting the public from injury or death.

But weirdly,  Judge Culver accepted the prosecution case saying  “The accused so seriously failed to properly manage the vehicle that he created a real danger.”   And the fucking kid didn’t? FFS, what planet are you from,  Judge? With this skewed conclusion, Judge Culver will be a big hit on the Eastern Suburbs dinner party circuit of woke wankers.

The ‘Pie should point out here that nowhere that he can see was Wright’s aboriginality ever referenced, it was not part of the case, it seems.  You’d think if the it would’ve been had there been any evidence of racism or police targeting. But there wasn’t single mention relevant to the matter.Yet guess what happened?

When it was revealed that Wright was indigenous (apparently), his father, his extended family and some of the usual professional activists made sure the court was packed throughout the trial,  even requiring a spill-over room, putting some very unsubtle pressure on the judge.  We will never know if this played a part in her findings.

It is impossible to believe that this won’t be chucked out on appeal, but let’s get to the real problem in this whole situation.

A copper being charged with dangerous driving while sitting in a parked car in a manner designed to keep the public safe from a motorcycle thief is one thing, but here is an interesting question – did Sgt Bryant know the identity of the thief, and that he was aboriginal? Or was he just trying to stop and apprehend a vehicle thief?

Not that it matters, EXCEPT for one thing.

That whole cohort that packed the courtroom rallied outside after the verdict to claim police racism had caused the death and justice had been done.  Led by Wright’s father,  they claimed the boy’s death  was another example of police unfairly targeting aboriginals. But if the sergeant was unaware of Wright’s ethnicity, or even if he was, how in any sane world is this race related?

So 97% of the population might see this as a police officer taking prompt and reasonable steps to keep the public safe from an out-of-control motor bike thief travelling at dangerous speeds that would likely to kill innocent members of the public.

Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 7.27.43 pm

But because this kid, who in essence, killed himself, was part pf the blessed blended three per cent, activists (and the father) jumped in for a bit of copper bashing, doing untold damage to their constantly trumpeted desire for ‘reconciliation’, whatever they mean by that. And yet again, not a single word that the parents took any responsibility, for their boys actions,  adopting the usual the general victimhood attitude promoted amongst aborigines.   NOT-A-SINGLE-WORD.

But hey, you can’t keep a good, blindly biased activist down, so we also got this:

In a statement after the verdict, Principal Legal Officer of the Aboriginal Legal Service (ALS) NSW/ACT, Nadine Miles, said it is “rare for police officers to face criminal charges when they are involved in the death of a community member, and even rarer for a court to return a guilty verdict. We are not aware of a previous instance where a police officer has been held criminally responsible for the death of an Aboriginal person in custody or in a police operation in NSW,”  Ms Miles said.

You are a deeply dishonest person, Ms Miles, because in this case he was a motor bike thief behaving dangerously… and just happened to be an aborigine – apparently.

There deep and systemic problems in police/indigenous relations,  and in all states, the police and governments are addressing the issue.  It just seems that no action for solving the issue falls to the indigenous community except blind, stupid insistence on total victimhood.  People like you Mr Wright are part of the problem, but you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge that reality, despite the terrible lesson you have been dealt.

Amerika

Came across something clever during the week, it is both funny and appalling at the same time.  How have Americans allowed themselves to get to this? Hope this link works for you, if it doesn’t have a poke around the internet for a format you can watch, It will be worth it. Much of the rest of the week had cartoonists concentrating on turkey pardons, thanksgiving,  and the peacemaster explaining his boss Putin’s wishes in Ukraine.

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 9.25.39 am 

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 9.25.24 am Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 9.24.49 am Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 9.23.13 am Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 9.23.30 am Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 9.24.11 am Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 10.06.07 am Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 10.05.46 am Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 10.07.26 am Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 10.06.59 am Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 10.06.17 am

Finally …

… a few blasts from the past,  to lighten the mood. For reasons known only to my computer, a few archived bits from old Nests popped up, and thought two or three were worth a guffaw again.

First up …. run, don’t walk.

Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 5.10.57 pm

And a message from Ergon: Never attempt to fix a power sockets, especially with a fork.

Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 4.56.15 pm

And there was never any mystery …

Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 5.34.31 pm

It was Monty.

…………..

Ah, can we now head to the sunlit uplands of an election-free future?  The ‘Pie’s sure going to enjoy it while it lasts.

The donation link is below, if you’re of a mind. see you next week.

The Magpie's Nest is now more than five years old, and remains an independent alternative voice for Townsville. The weekly warble is a labour of love and takes a lot of time to put together. So if you like your weekly load of old cobblers, you can help keep it aloft with a donation, or even a regular voluntary subscription. Paypal is at the ready, it's as easy as ... well, easy as pie. Limited advertising space is also available.

160 Comments

  1. Indian Joe says:

    Best present townsville got this year bye bye two dick two names troy thompson. Gone but not forgotten he still hanging around like a fart. Now to two face mark molochino labor to kap in a couple of weeks dont think so mate your still labor scum. Best news of the day your Goneeeeee like a smelly old rag.

  2. oops says:

    Under the photo of Chiesa from Bully, you note an ALP power struggle, methinks that should be an LNP one?

  3. Dazza says:

    Typo fix Magpie. It reads ALP power struggle when it should be LNP

  4. Alahazbin says:

    The story of the NSW police officer brought to mind this bloke I met on a recent tour while in the UK.
    I named him A Hole.

    Judge supports teens’ use of force against police
    11 Oct 2001 — A judge yesterday dismissed charges against two teenagers of assaulting police after he ruled that they acted in self-defence. Judge John Hole …

  5. Chucky Cheese says:

    Well, the Cheeseman has won Hinchinbrook. Crisafulli must be as hard as a tent pole having all of his captains picks win office. Long live the Ingham mafia.

    • Bob says:

      CC, it’s only a little thing but the word Chiesa in Italian means church. So the slang for the newly elected Member for Hinchinbrook would more appropriately be ‘churchman’.

  6. Noah says:

    Great idea on Rail Motors. We apparently have expertise on Rail – Road vehicles that move seamlessly between. I think that similar small units were used when the Ollera Creek bridge approach was washed out. Rail usually comes out of the water first after a major flood and Rail – Road vehicles could be a game changer for resupply of small communities as well as general transport. Managing interchange is always a disincentive for public transport and staying on the same vehicle for the journey would be attractive. And only .50 cents.

  7. Ducks Nuts says:

    Re Police Sgt Benedict Bryant:

    The prosecution’s case centered on Bryant’s decision to position his vehicle in a way that created a deadly hazard.

    The judge found that several factors made Bryant’s driving dangerous:

    Awareness of the situation: Bryant was aware a police direction had been given stating the young man was not to be chased while on the trail bike. Despite this, he positioned his vehicle to intercept the teenager.

    Foreseeable risk: A person of Bryant’s experience should have known the danger of his actions. The judge emphasized that just because Bryant placed his car in the path didn’t mean the rider would be able to stop.

    Failure to account for obstructions: Bryant failed to consider how other parked cars in the intersection would have impacted the boy’s ability to see the police car in his path.

    Speed misjudgment: While Bryant estimated the teen was traveling at 40-50 km/h, he was actually going 68 km/h. However, the judge found this misjudgment did not absolve his actions because he knew or should have known that speed estimates are inherently unreliable.

    Importantly, no evidence pointed to the sergeant intending to injure or kill the teenager, but the charge was based on his driving creating a dangerous situation that resulted in death.

    • The Magpie says:

      You’ve just repeated what The ‘Pie and the article have said. Not sure what you’re getting at.

      But The Magpie’s point still stands … this wise-after-the-fact judgement does not at any stage (from the reporting) balance the danger to the bike thief, and the danger to the general public, whose safety the police are sworn to protect. The thief killed himself, because given the fatal evasive action he took, he voluntarily made the decision to try to escape when he could have stopped.

      And the egregious behaviour and statements by the father and an aboriginal activist galah were boosted by the deeply flawed judgement … the thief’s race was totally irrelevant to the case, and for the suggestion that this was police targeting aboriginals so deeply damages the very real cases of police racism – which certainly exist, and are slowly being addressed, but are nothing to do with this matter.

      • Ducks Nuts says:

        Magpie I’m reiterating the judges findings for you, because you seem to be have trouble understanding them.

        The findings essentially came down to this: regardless of what Wright was doing wrong, Bryant’s decision to block his path without proper warning created a foreseeable risk that a reasonable officer in his position should have recognized and avoided.

        Even though Wright was riding a stolen bike at excessive speed and shouldn’t have been there, Bryant still had a duty not to create an unreasonable risk of serious harm or death.

        • The Magpie says:

          Don’t be fucking impudent. The ‘Pie can read, and this is a fucked-up judgement on so many levels. Just because he doesn’t read with a lawyers arcane knowledge, The ‘Pie can reason quite OK, thanks. And stands by everything previously said. And adding that seeing a vehicle in time enough to try to swerve and avoid capture shows he could’ve pulled up, sliding perhaps … but not dead. And he did not plough into the vehicle, he swerved, hit an obstacle, became airborne and THEN landed on the police car. And as your weasely ‘regardless’, like the judge, you are giving every benefit of the doubt and demand for rights to the thief, not lining up the balance of probabilities with the balance of police decision making in a matter involving serious public safety.

          Classic case of the old saw … you go to court for justice, and all you get is the law.

          Let me ask you this. Ducky … you seem to think this is clear cut, are you seriously saying that – let’s say – 9 other district court judges would’ve reached the same reasoning and decision? Who might have resisted the pressures of a simmering, biased audience and reached a more measured decision rather than the ridiculous (in this case) judgement of what is wrongly deemed to amount to passive manslaughter?

          • Ducks Nuts says:

            Magpie, I get that you’re frustrated with the outcome. Balancing stopping dangerous offenders and how police do it, is tricky.

            But you’re missing how the legal standard actually works here. The question wasn’t whether Wright “deserved” what happened because he was stealing and fleeing. The question was if Bryant’s actions created an unjustifiable risk of death or serious harm.

            The fact that Wright was doing something wrong doesn’t give police carte blanche in how they respond. The law has consistently held that police must use proportionate methods and avoid creating unnecessary dangers, even when dealing with offenders. That’s not new or radical, it’s the basic duty of care we expect from our police. One of the better police forces in the world.

            You say Wright could have stopped instead of swerving. Think about what that actually tells us. If he had enough time to attempt evasion, Bryant had enough time to use less dangerous methods: sirens, lights, following the protocol that explicitly said not to chase.
            The judge found Bryant knew about that directive and positioned his vehicle anyway.

            In regards to race: Nadine Miles didn’t claim this specific incident was racially motivated. She noted that convictions in Indigenous deaths during police operations are statistically rare. That’s an observable fact about the broader pattern, not a claim about Bryant’s intentions.

            And although its fair to question if other judges would rule the same way, the findings were based on specific evidence: Bryant’s knowledge of protocols, his awareness of the risks, his speed miscalculation, the obstructed sightlines. Those are factual findings that support the legal conclusion about foreseeability and negligence.

            Nobody’s saying this isn’t tragic for everyone involved. But the legal principles applied here, about duty of care and creating foreseeable risks, are well established.

          • The Magpie says:

            Legal standards are always open to interpretation, or otherwise we woukldn’t have judges, juries and lawyers, and instead, just AI robots doing letter of the law judgements. (And the way the world is contorting, maybe that’s not far away.) It is indisputable that the judge could’ve found the other way, and it really came down a fine point … opinion. In other words, what you call ‘interpretation’. And no matter how much we would like a perfect, imperturbable judicial figure on the bench, The ‘Pie will always believe this judge was affected – maybe subconsciously – by the presence of an ethnic crowd united in seeking just one verdict. Your fooling yourself if you think njudges aren’t susceptible to social (and political although not in this case) pressures.

            This should really have gone to a jury, then there could be no argument (doesn’t matter why it didn’t, it should not have been allowed to be judge only).

            It’ll be interesting to see if this is overturned and why.

            As to your silly comment about Nadine Miles, if race had nothing to do with it, why was she quoted at all, because it has fuck all to do with her remit (although now The ‘Pie is being silly, considering the publication her comments appeared in). And if race had nothing to do with it, is his further proof that the Indigenous lobby is refusing to accept any responsibility of the chasm between them and the laws the rest 97% of us obey, or accept its punishment.

            But as an observer for many years of the legal milieu, The ‘Pie finds it interesting that a man deemed to have killed someone and could be facing years in jail and a 20+ year career shot to pieces, walked unhindered from court to be sentenced NEXT APRIL. That sort of delay in a verdict involving death seems a bit off centre, doesn’t it? That may be a scheduling matter, but it could hint that even the judge herself would like to see what an appeal court has to say.

          • Bob says:

            A couple of details. I can’t find it out for sure but it’s likely that Bryant chose to have a judge-only trial. He also chose not to give evidence.

          • The Magpie says:

            Presumably because he believed he had nothing to answer for. Which he didn’t.

          • Kenny Kennett says:

            So will this set a precedent if a local council puts bollards in a mall to stop terrorist drivers plowing through pedestrians? Or if police set up a street blockage to stop crims post illegal offenses?

          • Ducks Nuts says:

            Magpie, the sentencing delay will be a court scheduling matter, not a signal of judicial doubt. Manslaughter cases routinely involve months between conviction and sentencing for pre-sentence reports. You know this, you’ve spent time reporting around courts. But you appear to be grasping at straws because you don’t like the outcome.

          • The Magpie says:

            Don’t think The ‘Pie is the one grasping at straws. You refuse to make any allowance that this may be wrong, and that an appeal court might disagree with your letter-of-the-law certainty.

            We’ll see what happens. Best suspend our now entrenched views until then, we can’t take it any further at this point.

          • Bob says:

            I’m not sure policeman Bryant was well advised. The ABC news report said Bryant’s lawyer was Brent Haverfield SC (Senior Counsel). But Haverfield is not listed on the NSW Senior Counsel list and this could mean a simple mistake or mishearing by the ABC journo. It could also mean the policeman got second rate advice both in choosing a judge-only hearing and in not giving evidence, especially if, as you presume, he believed he had nothing to answer for. Bryant might be waiting a while for his appeal to be heard but what’s the bet he agrees with the advice given to Tony Mooney around his legal position over the shenanigans about branch stacking back in the day: ‘Better get a lawyer son, better get a REAL GOOD ONE.’

          • Dorfus says:

            Kenny, Nutty and Pie

            Whilst the case law decision has NSW ownership, Kenny I can see the day when each of the TCC stones in the parks will have to be well-lit and carry a flashing light.

      • Alahazbin says:

        Pie, Same type of thing happened here in Townsville in the ‘70’s. They were chasing some bikey’s around town. So they parked the cop car in the driveway of the Shoredrive Motel and rolled it out as they were flying down the Strand, Killed the rider and the pillion was seriously injured. True story.

        • The Magpie says:

          Any charges against the police?

          • Alahazbin says:

            No, nothing. The copper sort of redeemed himself, when he talked some bloke of a roof who was trying to do himself in. He used to come into the servo I worked at. He was a bit of a smart arse.

          • Ducks Nuts says:

            No charges, sounds about right for Queensland police in the ’70s.

            Before the Fitzgerald Enquiry cleaned house, officers could use tactics that got people killed and walk away. That’s not because what they did was fine – it’s because it was a broken system and dangerous tactics resulted in deaths and officers faced no accountability.

            That’s why Bryant’s case matters. The rules exist now because back then, people died and nothing happened.

          • The Magpie says:

            That’s the weakest possible argument to justify the Bryant case.

          • Ducks Nuts says:

            It’s not an argument to justify the verdict. It’s context for why the protocols exist. You’re conflating the existence of rules with their application to this case.

          • The Magpie says:

            ‘Application’ being the key word, in this case, a synonym for ‘opinion and interpretation’.

            Any way we’ve run our race on this one, no more until either appeal or sentence.

    • Russell says:

      Hence the 68 kph estimate was inherently inaccurate also. Perhaps the actual was closer to 40-50 after all. Not that it matters.

  8. Turkey neck says:

    So Albo got married – big fucking deal. A man who has never held a real job, came from union background then into politics. A commie who has appointed an E-Karen commissioner to block free speech. As I said, who gives a shit that this lowlife got married.

  9. The Magpie says:

    What with Cheesy in Hinchinbrook and Big Swinging Nick in Townsville, poor old TwoNames is having a major attack of RDS (Relativity Deprivation Syndrome,) so The ‘Pie is hearing he and his close bestie have taken a seaside holiday break out of town, working out what next.

    • Percy says:

      Two cockheads. They deserve each other. I’m surprised they aren’t wearing tinfoil hats!

    • The Magpie says:

      Ya gotta love the Bully.

      Have they made an expensive mistake in their breathless rush for more Thompson glory? The inference is irrefutable.

      They seem to think they’ve made some special revelation by ‘exposing’ bargain basement boofhead Stephen Lane as Thompson’s advisor – by clear inference, the unnamed one in the CCC report – a fact that has been regularly aired in this blog for more than 18 months, when the 2024 mayoral campaign kicked off. And over that time, he’s been regularly identified in connection with TwoNames in various editions of the Nest and in comments.

      BUT HAS THE PAPER MADE A BOO-BOO AND EXPOSED ITSELF TO SOME EXPENSIVE LEGAL GOUGING.


      What’s next for Stephen Lane – shelf stacking at IGA?

      The ‘Pie has been reporting Lane’s advisory capacity from before the 2024 mayoral campaign began, but Bulletin reporters are specifically prohibited from mentioning The Magpie, the Nest or Malcolm Weatherup in their pages (fair enough, I’d feel the same if someone had taken me down in a million dollar defo suit), so Caitlin Charles flapped around desperately to try and find another source for the ‘unnamed’ advisor in the CCC report.

      She came up with a no doubt honest former Bully and now tv reporter Bethany Ross, who said Lane had told her confidentially he was Thompson’s adviser. Taking Stephen Lane’s word for anything is a leap of faith few would be willing to take, let alone basing a dangerous defaming story on it.

      So here is the problem … Charles has pinned her allegation that Lane was the mysterious adviser talked about in the CCC report on a presumably unsworn statement by a girlie friend. But the CCC has deliberately NOT revealed the adviser’s identity, and there is the possibility there may have been someone else in Thompson’s ear. That may be unlikely but still, it may have been best, Caitlin, if you had heeded the editor’s dictum ‘when in doubt, leave out’. Because that is the sort thing that is manna from heaven for a half-baked legal wannabe like Lane, always looking for a quick quid.

      So the email exchanges the paper have now attributed to Lane are such he could laughably claim ‘reputational damage’. If it turns out it wasn’t Lane – or even if it was Lane but he decides to say it wasn’t him (confident the CCC wouldn’t and couldn’t expose him), he could make a lot of nuisance legal trouble for the Bulletin.

      That is, if he had any money, which does not seem to be the case – the CCC report states that Thompson paid ‘the adviser’ $5300 in 23 separate payments over three months – or about $400 pw. Professional advisers (consultants they call themselves) start at around $5000 a week. And if this Reject Shop legal dumbster wants to go it alone against the legal might of News Ltd, one can only say good luck and God speed.

      Anyway, the Bulletin, again tipped off by The Magpie’s Nest, ‘revealed’ to their readers something that any person wanting to be informed on these matters would have known for the past 18 months. But it sort of fits their general reporting timeline.

      • Headmistress says:

        Bethany Ross stated that Lane had turned up to her office and showed her confidential emails between a TCC employee and Thompson. Hope she diarised this meeting and kept notes (before taking a Silkwood shower and Glen20-ing her office).
        Still many questions to be answered re Thompsons conduct…e.g. where did he get the internal TCC emails that he published on his fb page? I would imagine the source could be easily identified via the council IT system.

        • The Magpie says:

          If that is the case (highly believable), there are even more questions re Lane’s conduct. As fasas is known, Lane has absolutely no right or excuse to be in possession of internal emails from the TCC – ones which were neither received or sent by TwoNames.

      • Steve Jones says:

        Given the Bulletin people are always using your page for stories, is there any chance you could be a columnist? I know there’s history, but in their ever-declining state they need some real journalistic talent not the crap people are currently exposed too. Jill came highly recommended, hasn’t she been a big letdown, nothing has improved, seems to be a free for all.

        • The Magpie says:

          In answer, no, not a snowballs, Steve. Besides, the only appeal The Magpie’s jottings have for a few interested folks is based on the freedom to say things that a cashed-up corporation can’t say in their newspapers without exposure to weak defamation laws. The ‘Pie is always open to civil actions from those who don’t like what they read here, but civil actions cost a bomb and as one eminent barrister once told the old bird ‘ it is always about the money’. Of which The ‘Pie has SFA. Or assets (a 1997 Corolla Seca, missing it’s boot badge, wouldn’t cover the costs of the original concerns letter). Not that what what appears in the Nest is written with some sort of carte blanche, The ‘Pie was a journo long enough to employ some circumspection but still achieve his aim of giving the community a platform on which to discuss and bicker over issues the paper won’t touch (don’t want to upset the advertisers, do we?)

          And on that last point, it is noted with interest and contemplation that TEL names the Bulletin as one of its ‘partners’ along with the council, the airport and a few other businesses. So much for independence that puts the community well being ahead of any coercive associations, that notion went out the window when The Pickled Walnut got his claws into what had been a fine publication.

          So don’t expect any critical views or questions about TEL from that quarter.

          • Bob says:

            Magpie, you wrote:

            “So much for independence that puts the community well-being ahead of any coercive associations. That notion went out the window when The Pickled Walnut got his claws into what had been a fine publication.”

            Murdoch took over the Townsville Daily Bulletin in the early 1980s after Joh Bjelke-Peterson changed the Queensland publishing and printing legislation to suit Murdoch’s interests. Sorry to disappoint you but the broadsheet TDB had been a shocker from time to time before that and the new owner brought a breath of fresh air – for a while. Mind you, Murdoch had Joh wrapped around his little finger. But you would have seen this from inside when you worked there.

          • Steve Jones says:

            Fair, is then any opportunity for the ‘Sun’ or similar to start up. I notice Sumptons Gazette in the towers is gaining momentum, shouldn’t we have an alternative too?

          • Bob says:

            Steve J, I can’t imagine a wealthy entrepreneur in 2025 starting up a local newspaper from scratch because someone they had never heard of thought it might be a lovely idea.

  10. Ben Rumson says:

    The Townsville rain radar is again playing silly buggers. Loop of two only images the last being at 4.09pm.
    All that money on a web site rework that nobody wanted or needed and not enough money to the Townsville rain radar.
    You would think prior to storm and cyclone season the radar and it’s other bits and pieces would be well serviced for reliability.
    Other radars are working correctly.
    I visit the BOM via reg.bom which has the old format with more information that the new useless warm and fuzzy waste of money.

    • CBD Board Chairperson says:

      The US company that won the BOM tender for million$ and responsible for the useless new system beat a couple of much cheaper and better Aussie options. One of those is a TSV company that has Qld State Rail using its system and they have also just signed up QFD (SES). This software uses BOM data and other sources and provides much better weather and flood warnings. It’s a local success story that’s a rarity – no help from TEL. :)

      • I'malsoScoop says:

        SES is no longer part of Queensland Fire… it’s now under Police.
        That said, here’s hoping the Orange Army gets the best info available regardless of where it comes from.
        It’s the least they deserve.

      • Board Secretary says:

        The BOM CEO is accountable for the website expenditure and ultimate fuckup. He has bailed from the BOM and is now the CEO with Gladstone ports corporation. Seems like the slippery CEO bailed before the shit hit the fan. Gone from one government clusterfuck to another from what I hear.

    • Mangrove Jack says:

      Thanks for the heads-up. This is the link for the old BOM site

      https://reg.bom.gov.au/australia/radar/

  11. Roo de-Marks says:

    Trump’s move to ensure far better evaluation of “migrants” must be very welcome in USA.

    Our housing crisis has been caused by the incompetence of a series of weak and gutless immigration ministers.

    They carried on approving “migrant” applications during the COVID freeze; then when it miraculously disappeared these Zombies enabled all the +1.3 million approved applicants from that 3 year period to enter Oz en masse over a 4 month period.

    Blame lays with the usual big mouth ex-ministers Morrison and Dutton!

    • Jatzcrackers says:

      RdM, the ever-growing housing crisis has happened for serval reasons not just migration. AirBNB is one of the big silent icebergs that has contributed to long term rental properties not being available and the investors owners not selling their properties due to the very attractive income stream.

      Close family friends of mine are currently paying $2500 a week for an AirBNB house that under todays rental rate is $1000 a week.

      Local Councils have been slow is ensuring that AirBNB properties are actually registered (which attracts a high annual fee) thus plenty of the property owners have been flying under the radar.

      • The Magpie says:

        And, Jatz, your analyse doesn’t go back far enough … the AirBNB boom goes back to the introduction of negative gearing … the short term rental opportunities were an dopey unintended consequences of sloppy legislation (which, with foresight, could’ve contained a condition prohibiting such geared properties being used for short term rentals … bit obvious one would’ve thought.)

    • Big Mac says:

      The housing crisis predates the post-Covid surge and has many contributing factors going back to the Howard years (eg, CGT discount).

  12. Prince Rollmop says:

    Fuck me sideways it’s been a busy few weeks with the Twonames show, the reported shenanigans and now the Hinchinbrook by-election. The Magpie is busier than he has ever been. Puts Lighton Smith to shame.

    It’s so funny how now that Twonames is gone, all of the secrets are being spilled. Firstly we had the CCC report, which highlighted Twonames covert activities in his trying to damage McCabe and the other Councillors and his use of encrypted apps. Then we have the revelation that Twonames mate, or should I say his “advisor”, Stephen Lame, is the muscle behind Twonames. McCabe must be laughing as it is Thompson who got a royal kick to the balls. How sweet life can be. Karma can be a real cunt.

    I hope Townsville remembers that Twonames is just the head on the pimple. The pus that lies beneath the surface includes Stephen Lame and Venten. Cookers of a feather stick together. Employ these morons at your own peril.

    • Steve Jones says:

      PR, you seem deeply troubled mate, maybe take a pill to bring down the blood pressure. Thompson is no longer in the chair, though I suspect the reason he did not respond to the CCC report or was interviewed was because of his matters in place with human rights and industrial relations, and the legal advice given to him at the time. This is not over by a long shot, and with Guest Lawyers representing him, he has a better that good chance of cashing in, and now there was no prosecution, even more so. Originally supported by Andy Telford locally, and then recommended to Guest Lawyers in Brisbane, you can bet there is a lot more to play out. Guest has some very good cases won over local government, and with a few silks attached, he will not go away. This bloke’s political career is over, but he has ample opportunity to make good on the cluster that the local government minister created, this is a long way from over. The no prosecution finding is a segway to compensation. FFS what a mess.

      • The Magpie says:

        You’ve always seemed to have a bit of a soft spot for Thompson, Steve, although you attempt to disguise it behind a bit of ‘give an dtake’ verbiage. But be that as it may, and seeming to have at least a smattering of legal nouse,play devil’s advocate for us and suggest how the government and the council might defend any detrimental actions brought against them

        And surely Guest Lawyers have done a part pro bono deal with Thompson, who – going by The Magpie’s experience – even if he won, will end up with very little indeed. Just sayin’.

        • Steve Jones says:

          I’m by no means a supporter of that individual!
          As far as recommendation for council, I wouldn’t know where they may begin. It’s a matter of interpretation like all matters. Thompson was suspended, given two show causes, and the state government justified its actions in parliamentary report. The CCC report demonstrates the independent body found there was no need to prosecute, though it can be said this was more about timing. This outcome has provided Thompson an opportunity to put in a claim, remembering this is about before the CCC report, and he was still legally employed. Based on the report, it could be alleged that the state government should have not suspended or provided show causes. The October transcript and report demonstrates the minister set the time line for the CCC due to the impending suspension ending, which she cannot do to an independent body. The state must apply the recommendations, or the CCC have lost the public support, and this leads to questions on their integrity. The local government have nothing to pay, as they kept his salary up throughout, there was no discrimination as Thompson points too. My thoughts would be, put the new reforms in, make the recommendations part of the act and move on. Thompson doesn’t have the money for defamation, but every time the local or state government move on him, he has councillor and officers insurance for his time in office, paid by us, the ratepayer. Ignore him, move on, his actions will serve as karma, he won’t be in politics ever again.

  13. Toy Thompstain says:

    There are a couple of valid points that come out of the Lane and Thompson saga;

    1: It shows how Troy is a bad judge of character. He engaged Lane and still failed in his mayoral campaign. Some advisor that Lane is. FAIL.

    2. Lane placed his already shitty reputation in Troy’s hands. What a fool. He has come out of this episode looking line an even bigger fuckwit.

    These two muppets should leave Townsville immediately. There is no future here for the both of you, so just piss off.

    • The Magpie says:

      The travel plans of both will centre on where they can get a dishonest quid, and that seems to offer no reason as to why they’d leave town. Until they win big, and move to the Gold Coast.

      • Toy Thompstain says:

        Perhaps we could pass a hat around (or a Priests donation box) and see if we get enough money to send both of them packing?

      • Jatzcrackers says:

        Gold Coast Pie ??? Those two pretenders would get eaten up on their first day if the looked like trying any shafting stunts down on the GC.
        The real pros down on GC don’t fuck around and the two grifters would be lined up pretty quick and mowed down by a black McLaren/Ferrari/Lamborghini that would barely make page 11 of the local rag !

    • Flaccido Domingo says:

      And they can take Brian Venten with them. He too is a Tinfoil wearing idiot. If these clowns all left Townsville it would be a better and more sane place to live. Maybe they can go live in their secret bush dug out and await the end of the world together?

  14. John Wilkes Booth says:

    The bullshit is getting too thick.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-01/traditional-healers-of-central-australia-ngangka%E1%B9%9Fi-book/106044308

    If there was a grain of truth in this witchdoctor voodoo:
    1. Aborigines pre European contact would have lived long and healthy lives and without high infant mortality, and
    2. There would be no need for the likes of the Aboriginal Torres Strait Ilander Health Service.

    • The Magpie says:

      That doesn’t work, quite the opposite. It is absolutely true that white settlement brought just about all the ailments outside broken limbs to Australian aborigines, so they most certainly need modern health serves, often best administered by themselves.

    • Bob says:

      JWB, I googled “English life expectancy 1770″ to get an idea of how things were back in the day. The AI overview told me:

      “In 1770, English life expectancy at birth was low, around 35 to 40 years, with some sources placing the average closer to 37 years. This low average was largely due to extremely high infant and child mortality rates, meaning that while most people did not live to be very old, those who survived childhood had a reasonable chance of reaching adulthood.”

      I’ll leave it to you to google Aboriginal life expectancy in the same time period. Then you can multiply by introduced disease, divide by extreme poverty from administrative dispossession, subtract a bit of white supremacy and add a touch of ethnic cleansing to find a reason why there needs to be a culturally appropriate Aboriginal and Islander health service. Clearly, you have no idea.

    • Toejammer says:

      Aagh yes, the race that brought us didgeridoo’s, boomerangs, and mythical sea serpents. And for that, we give them free housing, jobs, vehicles, tax breaks, Centerlink incentives, government funded course’s and a range of other ‘black fella only’ benefits. Now let’s all go and welcome ourselves to our country..

      • Bob says:

        I think we have already made ourselves at home in our country, Toejammer. Or haven’t you noticed?

      • Toejammer says:

        Well, according to the endless government departments who do a welcome to country before each meeting , and according to the organisazers of sporting events, we need to be welcomed to our own country every time. So no Bob, apparently I am not welcome in my own country, I need to be welcomed by some obscure First Nations people every day!!!

        • Bob says:

          Toejammer, since you apparently don’t feel welcome in your own country (at least that’s what you say), go ahead, define ‘country’ to be whatever you want it to be and outrage yourself. I acknowledge your right and your choice to be offended.

        • Pat Coleman says:

          I’m a white fella and if I had my way everyone like you would be deported to an open carry state In America or Russia you fascist troll.

          Why Mal let’s you people spread this far right rubbish has got me stuffed.

          You aren’t that hard up for funds are you Mal?

  15. Elusive Butterfly says:

    Mr Pie, it’s only Monday and already the blog has descended to a level that usually occurs by Saturday. Please control the kiddies.

  16. Jeff, Condon says:

    Going back to the Bryant/Wright case. Based on the judgement, if QPS members lay out road spikes, should they not then have lights flashing and officers nearby prepared to warn the offenders away from the placement to ensure the offenders can find another avenue (pun intended) of safe escape and avoidance of injury?

    The judgement seems to be made in the interests of the law, not the interests of the people. And, as there is no connection between law and justice, the is no connection between them and morals.

    • The Magpie says:

      Good point about the road spikes. A blowout at speed with an inexperienced panicked driver behind the wheel … what could go wrong?

    • Mdog says:

      If a police chase has got to a point of using road spikes, the offender has seriously gone past the point of a traffic stop. You talk about the safety of the offender. What about the safety of all the other road users, pedestrians, and others on and around roads. If a person is in the process of committing crime, they should be be apprehended and stopped from creating more carnage than they have already committed. If you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. This is the problem in today’s society, we put the crim before the victims and the general safety of the public.

  17. The anaconda says:

    I can confirm that Lane has parted ways from his realestate employer. The departure was indeed very sudden with his employer being very pleased to be rid of him.

    • Franz Ferdinand says:

      The realestate agency will make more sales now the bullshit artist has left. I bet he has gone into car sales, another forum of work for the bald headed muppet.

  18. The Magpie says:

    BIFFO CONDON 10 – THE POLICE 0.

    Oh, dear, a policeman’s lot is an even unhappier one this sunny morn.

    The dropping of weapons and other charges against Chris Condon chalks up another win for the serially charged show ground boss. Perhaps more significantly, it also chalks up another abysmal face full of egg for police, in this latest case, the AFP.

    During a raid on Condon’s show ground offices in 2020, the Feds said they found a pistol, two silencers and ammunition for which Condon did not have the necessary permits to possess. Although no charges seem to have been lodged, the bluebags also took possession of $11000 in cash.

    As is the way with these things, when the police prosecutor dropped the charges, he offered not even an evasively worded reason for the blunder. All the property is to be returned to Mr Condon, which raises a few questions.

    The Feds seized the money and charged Biffo with some sort of fraud on the government, but that charge were dropped in 2022 …. so why did they continue to hold the money for another three years, and not return it then and there? And will it be returned with suitable interest added?

    And if the weapons and ammo are also being returned, that surely means Condon was in legal possession of them in the first place. The ‘Pie wonders if Biffo’s lawyer, the canny Andy Telford, might be sniffing a juicy defo case?

    Over the years, The ‘Pie has followed the Condon v Police saga with bemusement. Suffice to say, in that time, nine matters (usually to do with weapons) were brought before the beaks, and all were dismissed – mostly for sloppy evidence – one way or another (including a spurious assault case of assault against a nutter Condon smacked around the ear for trespassing on show ground property – a biased Townsville jury found Biffo guilty, he appealed, got a new trial in Mackay and was acquitted). Back in the noughties, there were clear indications that some of the charges were driven by the personal animosity of a senior copper, who has long left the city.

    So yesterday’s latest pantomime nicely rounds off to ten -nil the Condon v coppers saga.

    But if Andy Telford is wringing his hands in anticipation of a damages claim, the Bulletin better keep an eye out.

    Of all the dozens of file photos of Condon (including a couple The ‘Pie himself took way back when) – like the one above that ran in the online edition the junior boofhead in charge of click bait decided to use the one pic from the Covid era that subtly suggests Condon was a bit of a mafia-looking crim.

    It was otherwise nonsensical to put up a pic that clearly made recognition impossible. Unless the paper was trying to say something subtle.

    Something subtle as a grenade in a bowl of porridge

    • Mdog says:

      Who can remember the day CC was the main bouncer around town. Everyone knew not to fuck around when he was manning the door

    • Alahazbin says:

      They should have gone back to when he was 17.
      Got out of a sticky one, thanks to daddy and friends in QP. Although a state matter.

  19. Percy says:

    Just like Thompson, Stephen Lane is a gutless turd. He won’t answer any questions regarding the reporting of him being Thompson’s advisor. And of course Thompson was also too gutless to publish his CCC report. Both are spineless cretins who lack testicular fortitude.

    • Steve Jones says:

      Agree with you, but as it stated by the media release, Thompson was advised it was illegal to release the report prior to due process taking place. He stated he had 30 days to respond, the councillor and offer insurance did not kick in until 7 days from publication, that was reported to the CCC and they had no choice but to extend him 21 days, which is the legal requirement. Looking at the report, all the items were ready well before, the CCC should have released the CEO payment information, the pre-election information, and the councillor and CEO complaints, they had plenty of time to give Thompson the information, and the confidential information was something that was late, there is no reason they could not have released it though. This sits squarely on Minister Leahy, Crisafulli needs to move her on and get someone capable of leading local government, my suggestion would be Christian Rowan, hes a good operator, or Tim Mander

  20. The Magpie says:

    Anybody know what Friday’s Special Council meeting is about?

    • Bob says:

      Agenda now published. Item 1 is appointment of councillor advisors. Ho hum.
      Item 2 is appointment to committees. Ho Ho hum (it’s Xmas).

      • Bob says:

        BTW, that’s Friday, 5 December, not “today”.

      • The Magpie says:

        Appointment of advisors Ho hum?

        • Bob says:

          Ho hum because when Mayor Thompson wanted one, two or was it three advisors the councillors voted 10-1 to stop him. Whatever the new mayor wants, let’s hope Premier Crisafulli keeps his nose out of it. Our elected councillors are perfectly capable of making such decisions, it’s our rates money not Brisbane’s and anyway, it’s none of his business.

          • The Magpie says:

            The ‘Pie doesn’t want to be around when reality catches up with you, Bob. It will be a pitiful sight.

    • I’ll be plucked says:

      Agenda is up there now, Pie. 1. Councillor Advisors. 2. Committee reps

      Meeting this Friday at 1pm.

      Here we go AGAIN!!! More money down the drain! :(

      • The Magpie says:

        Well, maybe but given the duties and the scope nof a good mayor should clover, an experienced advisor is an absolute necessity to be mayor of this size. So it will be most interesting to see who Crisfulli has selected to keep his man on course.

        So committees are back?

        • Percy says:

          Perhaps they can just keep John Oberhardt on a retainer and he can be Slick Nick the swinging dicks advisor? And what sort of advisor are we talking about? I recall Tom Taint from the Gold Coast hiring a spiritual advisor for council and getting paid six figures!!

        • I’ll be plucked says:

          Agenda Item 1 says: Counsellor Advisors……..plural, not singular, Pie.

          In relation to the position of Mayor, so what do the employees in the Office of The Mayor do and what do the rest of the shiny-arse crew do???

          This council is broke, like I suggested, more money down the drain! :(

          • The Magpie says:

            It ‘councillor’ advisors … and the plural is probably referring to the issue and regulations governing it. But you never know around this place.

  21. Prince Rollmop says:

    Interesting article. And I laughed at the mention of the Westminster system. It is a broken system that dates back more than a century. Governments have used and abused this system and crafted it to their own likings. Stacking boards with mates and rewarding them for loyalty has gone on for many decades. It happens within all three levels of government and to be honest, it is done with such regularity and unaccountability that it has become a standing joke. The “best candidate” for government boards is most definitely not necessarily an ex minister, bureaucrat or councillor. However I doubt this systemic rort will change in our lifetime.

    Oink oink political pigs at the trough.

    • The Magpie says:

      What The ‘Pie loved best about this was the media’s widespread outraged surprise at the report, which simply confirmed something every Australian has known for the past 150 years.

      • Prince Rollmop says:

        Correct mate, it’s a rort that has survived through the ages! Dopey media acting all shocked and surprised. Ha

    • Itchy balls says:

      The irony is that the whole Westminster system was originally meant to constrain the concentration of power through conventions, norms, and the idea that public roles are held “in trust.” but the trouble is, conventions only work when everyone agrees to keep playing by them, and norms dissolve fast when the incentive structure rewards clever loopholes instead. And that’s what we now have.

  22. Bungle in the jungle says:

    The role of an advisor to the mayor is justified. It’s common practise and shouldn’t be frowned upon. A decent hard working mayor does need one. I think Nick will be fairy energetic generating lots of work, meetings, advocacy etc. It’s a reasonable request. I think that just the one advisor should do the trick. Council already has an EA to the mayor and some other functions are handled by TCC staff. Be interesting to see what the other councillors think.

    • Ducks Nuts says:

      Fairy energetic. This I gotta see

      • Bob says:

        Ducks, I looked it up so you wouldn’t have to:

        What can fairies not touch?
        Iron
        In the Disney film Maleficent, the title character reveals early on that iron is lethal to fairies, and that the metal burns them on contact.

        When the new ironman mayor gets an advisor, the advisor can let him know.

    • Alahazbin says:

      Maybe Bungle, someone from his old state office is lined up for the job.

    • Bob says:

      So, Bungle, according to today’s Bulletin, the new mayor seems to be exceeding your expectations:

      “Nick Dametto faces his first major test as mayor today when councillors vote on his bid to appoint three political advisers.”

      Do you think councillors should get out their tried and true Thompson arguments to resist Mayor Dametto’s ‘overreach’ or should they fall back into Mayor Hill’s comfy lounge with a choreographed ‘Hail the Chief’?

  23. Tomahawk says:

    Ch7 is refusing to mention Bruce Lehrmann has lost his full bench of the fed court appeal of his defamation lawsuit, which held he raped Brittany Higgins. He didn’t just come back to the lions den for his hat, the lions wiped their arses with it.

    • Ducks Nuts says:

      Ch 7 is just protecting his dignity. Poor bloke. He’s such an upstanding member of society. Nothing to do with their involvement of course.

  24. Barfly says:

    I believe the councillors need independent legal advisers.

    • Roo de-Remarks says:

      And who will pay them? If the counselor is up to the task, then it’s his duty/problem.

      • The Magpie says:

        No, it’s ours. But it is not suggested councillors have individual advisors (christ, the rorts!!!) but they do have Nanny McPhee Oberhardt.

    • Bob says:

      Yes, Barfly, but they already have them. They are called ‘the electorate’. Councillors seek our advice (in various ways), receive it (in various ways) and apply it as they see fit. We reward them as we see fit. It’s an imaginative, nuanced and subtle process.

  25. Prince Rollmop says:

    An afternoon of cricket, some scrolling through the Nest, and a couple of cold schooners. Perfect!!

  26. Rue de-Remarks says:

    Going back to an unresolved issue a year maybe two ago, what ever happened to the pipes that arrived from Adelaide and were left out in the Sun.
    One of Jenny’s loose ends as I recall.

    • Doxie says:

      If they were the ones stored beside Shaw Road, out at The Bohle, they’ve all gone! We noticed it a little while ago on our way home.

    • Fact check says:

      Questions were asked about the pipes that weren’t answered as there’s been a state ordered review into the project that’s been running for the past year.
      https://share.google/H5zriEXhSf2PbMosz

      • Bob says:

        Thanks for that link, Fact check – although most of it was behind a paywall the little bit showing revealed so much:

        ” . . . . skyrocketing cost of the Council-led Haughton Pipeline project”.

        Remember that time a few years ago when the Morrison government was going to help poor old Townsville out of its water crisis by “fully funding” Stage 2 of the Haughton project – the bit that runs from the Haughton River across the back of the canefields beside the irrigation channel all the way to the Clare weir on the Burdekin River? Remember how the Queensland Labor government decided it was somehow being duped by the federal government over GST clawbacks so spurned the federal money and chose to fund the whole project itself (so long as Townsville coughed up $79m)? So now the pipes are in the ground but the pumps are not installed, let alone hooked up, the budget has blown way out, there’s plenty of water in the Ross River dam (for now, 70%), Lansdown is stalled (for now) so the pipeline has been moved onto the backburner, except for one little detail. As the Bulletin article discloses, the Haughton pipeline is now described as a “Council-led” project. It’s no longer “fully funded” by Canberra or Brisbane. This might be a nice little challenge for the Mayor, the five local LNP members (Burdekin, Mundingburra, Townsville, Thuringowa and Hinchinbrook) and the Premier to sort out. Or not.

    • Bob says:

      They’ve been buried. Out of sight, out of mind. No one wants them or needs them for the time being. But their time will come and with a whacking great bill. Funny how it turned out, eh?

  27. Jeff, Condon says:

    Both the elections done, Barry and his sidekick negated, TCC not presenting any howlers so there isn’t much to talk about. Crazy stuff continues to occur worldwide and throughout Australia, however, outside our scope of discussion.

    • The Magpie says:

      Why? The Nest was created to concentrate on Townsville, and the stuff regular media don’t tell us, but that doesn’t mean broader themes are off limits …cf the weekly US cartoon gallery has been there from day dot. But the basic policy is that Townsville takes precedence, and we don’t want either the blog or comments to become some elite Facebook or whatever. Current events are fine, up to a point.

  28. Tip says:

    Pie, I am told the Mayor is set to offer Michael Pugh an adviser position once approved by council today. With a very dark past this would be a terrible outcome for the city.

    • Home invader says:

      You should see the councils entry powers without warrant in the local government act and regs and by laws. You don’t even need a pointy bayonet or a rough looking Islander sidekick.

    • Jeff, Condon says:

      Who is Michael Pugh.

      • Blue Bells says:

        He was an unsuccessful KAP candidate for Mundingburra. In his campaign it was revealed he was a former stand over man for a local crime syndicate. He was given a wholly suspended 18-month term of imprisonment that he pleaded guilty to break and enter as well as stealing with violence in the early 2000s.
        He has since spent a lot of time volunteering, his claims of over 1000 hours a year to multiple organisations and has been honoured to receive numerous awards and recognitions for his contributions.
        He is the proud ringleader behind Townsville Hike and Explore aimed to get Townvilleans asses off the couch and into bushwalking in many places around the district.

    • Alahazbin says:

      Tip, All I can say is at least Slick Nick’s advisors won’t be a bunch of cookers like two-names was trying to get in.

    • Steve Jones says:

      Might not be KAP but his advisors will be from his Hinchinbrook office. $600,000. It would be madness to put Pugh in, he’s got a convicted criminal sure he’s doing a lot for volunteering NQ, just need to be cautious.

      As far as Slick went in his first meeting as chair, he was alright, though his illiterate nature came to the fore, arks (asks), whiff (with), remunurton (remuneration), he clearly suffers from reading issues too, so there’ll need to be some hand holding happening.

      • The Magpie says:

        Not sure he would be allowed to hire from his previous staff …. aren’t there some pretty tight rules about no political affiliations allowed when filling the mayoral advisors slot(s)? Of course that never bothered Labor when the Mullet was in power, Brisbane even sent up three Labor advisors over her time in Walker Street. One of whom irked her so much personally, he spent most of his time making paperclip chains.

        • Steve Jones says:

          Possibilities are Chief of staff – Mark Molachino, Policy Advisor – Catherine Holden (his Hinchinbrook policy advisor), Sarah Major (his Hinchinbrook media / communications / advisor). Pretty sure Catherine is locked in. Pugh is on the sidelines, has zero skills, Molachino is a close friend and confidant of Slick.
          Others from his Hinchinbrook office Caitlin Scofield, Kate Mason, Michael Sorenk, Tahnee Bartolini, Joanne Hodgett.

          Roles are:
          N03783 Chief of Staff (Councillor Advisor) $225,000
          N02565 Councillor Advisor $195,000
          N03783 Communications Officer $155,000

        • Ducks Nuts says:

          Im quite sure his advisors will be whomever lil Davey Crisafulli tells him they will be.
          The council “may” go through the process of advertising for the positions. And if so I’d encourage all and sundry to apply, (HR need to do something). But in the end it’ll be a captains pick.

          • The Magpie says:

            Not sure the mayoral adviser role is advertised, The ‘Pie has always understood that it is solely a captain’s pick i.e. the mayor’s. But still has to b ratified by council.

  29. Bordeaux Bob says:

    As a long-time rate payer could the new Mayor help us all out by revealing how much we are in for:

    Landsdown, so called “Eco-Industrial Precinct”.

    Haughton Water pipeline

    North Railway yards

    Council debt

    • The Magpie says:

      Dunno asbout all that but these some very noticeable action going on at the North rail Yards. Webby ain’t the sort to sit on his hands and hav an eternal gabfest.

      • Dolcalax the facetious says:

        My Viking name.

        Every wet season , just like my bowels, our sewerage system is under increasing strain.

        It’s coming out of drain holes and manholes at the shops and going into the lakes and Ross Ck. We have the poonami’s at Wulguru.

        Then, after a 1-200 mm when the rain coincides with the king tides and it backs up through dunnies and sinks they put out a warning only to flush if necessary and wait for the tide to go out when raw sewerage goes into the bay.

        Big new blocks of flats means more pressure on the system without increased TREATMENT capacity. And I’m not talking about to pump into the bay.

    • Southern Comfort says:

      I will say this, TCC does itself no favours when it comes to making information accessible. For the most part “BB” a lot of your answers are already buried around a myriad of places via the TCC website. The problem they have (and this was apparent in today’s Special Meeting on the Advisors and committe roles) is they use some web service called Resolve, which is probably where a lot more anger and attentions should be focussed). Even Cr Dirou pointed it out today that Councillors weren’t able to access the full document pack for today’s meeting via this system

      Going backwards through your points:
      -Debt – is well reported, and appears reasonable well managed through a Treasury report you will find in every second Ordinary Meetings doc pack in Resolve. It’s not searchable this way, but when you find it, and track it, as I do monthly, you find this fairly well managed, in line with all State Government guidelines and currently running at just 6% of TCC’s total market value equivalent. It’s not the dire picture everyone believes when you put it in context. $429m sounds a lot, but in context of what it’s covering, it’s just slightly under current market interest rates, and is being serviced well.
      -North Rail Yards – QAO flagged issues with the TCC SPV corporate entity. It’s being dismantled, and money from Brisbane flowing for site remediation. Given current property prices, and as Pie pointed out, Webby working hard on his side of the deal, I’d expect this to turn into a positive news story for TCC before to long.

      -HS2 – This is the only item that really is lacking in good detail. Hunt through the site as you may, you will find it woefully lacking in current updated information. Reconfirmed statements from the CEO that it won’t cost TCC ratepayers more than $79m. But nothing on how. This is the pressure button that people should be pressing for answers. And transparent information from TCC is yet to materialise. One hopes this is where the new Mayor will deliver some Brisbane and Canberra monies to shore up the project. Whilst completion times have been updated this year, they already look like a joke. But the “money” questions are what needs to be answered. There is nothing apparent in the Treasury reporting that indicates that TCC are spending anything differently to their claims. But the project is late, and no matter how you cut it, late generally means more. So far you’d have to ask serious questions on who is holding those extra costs. They’re not on the TCC books.

      -Lansdown is well documented and on plan. New loan put in place at the end of last FY, drawdown on schedule, and delivery appears to be consistent. This one seems to be more of a PR disaster than any other. No one has ever properly laid out the timelines in this project. It’s meeting them. But payback has not, and was not ever expected to start materialising until 2030-2032 timeframes. And this is. 20 year project. Not an overnighted. TCC (and whoever you want to consider in the Mayors chair at any time) have been crap for years on this, and let everyone believe the holy grail is closer than it appears. It’s not. But it is on documented target.

      My two recommended takeaways:
      1) Push for TCC to join at least the 2020’s with technology on how they document and present information to the public. They are years behind Council’s like Scenic Rim, Noosa, Redlands on having more transparent, publicly accessible information. Like I said, I have to painfully trawl through this Resolve system constantly to get updates on status. They are there for all but HS2. Just buried so deeply that they can’t demonstrate to anyone that they are doing the basic jobs on schedule. Perception gets damaged, as no one gives easy to understand answers, or points at a simple online dashboard where you can draw your own conclusions.

      2) HS2 is still where the answers aren’t. And the questions are.

      Now everyone is going to ask me to “prove it” and “where’s the link?”. And to that I go back to my issue 1 and the whole story. As you go through the TCC website (especially Council Meetings where a lot of this is in Officer Reports, you hit Resolve Red. The proprietary system used by TCC IT, built in decades past, And a PITA to work with. I post links, and they are likely invalid and dynamically regenerated in minutes. I have to use a range of different tools just to pull copies of the video livestream down to my PC to review. You’d think that when there is a nice camera style icon that you push, and the livestream plays (on a different tab or browser window than where you pushed the icon) that just getting a copy of the livestream for download would be easy. It’s not. Apparently TCC and Resolve are worried everyone will be pirating TCC meeting videos and the future of Netflix is at risk. If Netflix actually gave a flying…..follicle about TCC meeting videos.

      The information on 3 of your 4 topics is readily available, once you know where to look. It seems to be constantly misrepresented (“Oh we’re teetering on insolvency” prior to budgets to soften everyone up for the state Rises, to “we’re about to deliver surpluses” when you have a Mayoral by-election – funny how the good news only comes out when it’s useful – or wasn’t in that individuals case).

      If I look at your list and want to hammer home the one point that needs answers, it’s HS2. That is the elephant (mostly now) in the ground.

      Happy Fri-yay to you all!!

      • The Magpie says:

        For his sins, long ago when Mooney was mayor, The ‘Pie thought he’d have a shot at joining the comms/media team at the TCC. Got as far as an interview, with the basic message of more openness and staying ahead of the naysayer. Of course, the thanks but no thanks wasn’t long in coming, after I had the temerity to point out that the council was way too politicised and information ratepayers were entitled to know was often shielded from them, usually by incomprehensible jargon laden media release.

        In retrospect, good thing The ‘Pie was not hired, probably would’ve lasted maybe a month or two.

    • Bob says:

      BB, it’s really tedious having to repeat time after time the source of the available information you are looking for. So here is the latest I can find. If you google ‘TCC meetings’ and click on the Agenda for the 19/11/25 Ordinary Meeting then scroll down to Item 7 “Treasury Report” it’s all laid out for you to read for yourself. The debt at 31/10/2025 is $420.5m. The various loan facilities for Haughton pipeline and Lansdown are tabulated. I don’t know if you can interpret them but they are all there in black and white.

  30. Jatzcrackers says:

    Don’t think being a past convicted criminal is an issue these days. Seems to work ok for that wrecking ball fuckwit Trump !

    • The Magpie says:

      You think it’s working for him?!?

      • The Rougarou says:

        It’s working well for Trump. Estimates have him worth an extra $500m since becoming President. Most of that earned through bitcoin as his son-in-law Jarred Krishna invests heavily in it. Plus they have there hand in construction in foreign countries. A crook, shonk, and charlatan.

        • The Magpie says:

          And unravelling.

          But to what point?

          The only cold (maybe hot) comfort for the world is the old Sicilian saying: Once the game is over ALL the pidces go back in the same box.’

Post a Comment to The Magpie

The Magpie encourages all to take part in the discussion and let their voice be heard.
In order to post a comment, you must provide a name. While you don't have to use your real name, it should be something unique so users can identify you in the discussion. Generic names like “Anonymous” will likely result in your comment being ignored.
Let the discussion begin!

Current ye@r *

Countdown until the next council election:

-2081Days -1 -38 -55